Blog
Copyright © All rights reserved. Howard Fowlin 2019
Home.

About Me.

Met police dirty secret .

Free Legal Advice Page,links,books and pdf files.

The IOPC turns a blind eye to police Corruption.

My Youtube Favorite Police Corruption Videos .

FALSE-EVIDENCE-BY-POLICE.COM

The IOPC and the Police Standard, takes the Police Complaint Procedure as a Joke.

In their effort, to hide and to suppress evidence, in the Police complaint procedure:

 

Together they, turn a blind eye, to serious police corruption and fraud, committed at the Central London County Court by the Metropolitan Police.

 

Together they, willfully and/or otherwise, inappropriately misinterpret and misapply the Police Complaints and misconduct regulation act 2012.

 

On the 3rd November 2017, I decided to utilize the police complaint regulation act 2012, to refer the fraud committed on the 9th January 2017 by the metropolitan police, to the (IOPC).

 

My complaint fell into the category of serious corruption and is a mandatory referral to the IOPC

Statutory Guidance: Definitions of Serious corruption

The term serious corruption refers to conduct that includes: any attempt to pervert the course of justice or other conduct likely to seriously harm the administration of justice.”

 

THE SHAMEFUL AND DISGUSTING BEHAVIOR OF THE POLICE STANDARD. :

:

The magical tricks of Mr Steve (x) of the Police Standard and the devious methods used to disapply my complaint and halt any investigation into the matters of the complaint. :    

 

The steps used.:

  1. Record the complaint, which he had to by law.
  2. Record the complaint, under a heading, which is not related to the real complaint.
  3. Don’t take into account the details of  the complaint.
  4. Don’t record the details of  the complaint.
  5. Don’t record the incident dates referred to, in the complaint.  
  6. Refer only to any previous complaint and the date of that complaint.
  7. Misrepresent the facts of the previous complaint.
  8. Officially: deal with the complaint as if, there were no need to record the complaint as in (Regulation 5, (2), section (b) of the Police,  (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulation 2012.): e.g..   “The matter is already the subject of a complaint made by or on behalf of the same complainant.”

 

9. Officially: record the reason for the disapplication as in,  (Regulation 5, (2), section (a) of the Police,  (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulation 2012.). e.g.. Regulation 5, (2), section (a) “more than 12 months have elapsed between the incident, or the latest incident, giving rise to the complaint and the making of the complaint and either that no good reason for the delay has been shown or that injustice would be likely to be caused by the delay”

 

10. Make a application to the IOPC to disapply the currant complaint on the Ground that “More than 12 months have elapsed between the incident and the making of the complaint”

 

Quote from Mr Steve (x) “The matters of complaint related to concerns raised initially in 2012 and then subsequently in 2014. Parts of this complaint were investigated and you were provided with an outcome at the time. You now raise complaints about matters, which again occurred in 2014.”

 

 

Quote from Mr Steve (x) “Following my assessment of your complaint, I believe that it does not need any more investigation because it is Out Of Time (OOT).”

 

 

In the recording of the said complaint, Mr Steve (x) of the Police standard:

 

1. Failed to record the correct date of the complaint.

2. Failed to record the fact that, a complaint was lodge with the IPCC on the 3rd November 2017.

3. Failed to record the fact that, on the 9th January 2017, the complainant alleges that the Metropolitan

Police procured a civil court Judgement by means of fraudulent activities.

4. Failed to record the fact that, the complainant is alleging that, documents and exhibits such as: false

CRIS Crime report were use in a civil court to pervert the course of Justice on the 9th January 2017.

 

5. Failed to record the fact that, the complainant is alleging that, throughout the court proceedings the individuals complained of where busy fabricating evidence,a tampering with witness statement and creating false CCTV footage.

 

6. Failed to record the fact that, the complainant is alleging that, Helen Mackay of Tiffany & co, an ex-military police officer, was enlisted by the metropolitan police to provide a false witness statement, on the 5th September 2016, in an attempt to try and stop an application notice, make by the complainant, to strike out the metropolitan police’s defence.

 

7. Failed to record the fact that, the complainant is alleging that the following police officers and staff members supplied material evidence that was used to procure a court Judgement by fraudulent means.

 

  1. M.H Wood from the Paddington Green Police Station :

Incident date - 27-5-2014 to the 9-1-2017.

2. DS Brendan Gibbs – 195682- from the Paddington Green Police Station:

Incident date - about -10-6-2014 to the 9-1-2017.

3. PC 1422CW –M.Humphrey- from the Paddington Green Police Station :

Incident date, about - 18-6-2015 to the 9-1-2017.

4. PC 1183CW H. Whyte from the Belgravia or the Paddington Green Police Station

-Incident date, about - 18-6-2015 to the 9-1-2017.

5. PC AD Watts 190715- from the Paddington Green Police Station: :

Incident date -18-6-2015 to the 9-1-2017.

6. Directorate of Legal Service –about January 2016 to 9th January 2017.

7. Not a member of the police force but colluded with the above individuals to commit fraud in court.  Helen Mackay of Tiffany & Co the European Director of Security  - 5th September 2016 to the 9th January 2017.

 

 

THE SHAMEFUL AND DISGUSTING BEHAVIOR OF THE IOPC. :

 

 

The magical tricks of Emma (x) of the IOPC, who wilfully and/or otherwise, misinterpret the IOPC Statutory Guidance, on the issue of Grounds for disapplication. In favour of the (MPS) Metropolitan Police Service.

 

Emma (x)’s interpretation of the Statutory Guidance.On the issue of Disapplication.:

 

“ According to Statutory Guidance a complaint which is assessed as being “out of time “ is one which has been made after 12 months giving rise to the original incident and there being no good reason provided for the delay.”

 

Comment: Emma (x)’s interpretation of the law, is totally wrong, she appears to be making up her own version of the law.

 

The Statutory Guidance she refers to is in effect:

 

Regulation 5, (2), section (a) of the Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2012 “more than 12 months have elapsed between the incident, or the latest incident, giving rise to the complaint and the making of the complaint and either that no good reason for the delay”

 

Conclusion IOPC:

 

Emma (x) of the IOPC wilfully and/or otherwise failed to take into account the rules, in regards to a chain of events. Statutory Guidance Notes: “12 months have passed between the incident (or the latest incident in a chain of events) and the making of the complaint.

 

In so doing she failed to follow the construction of the Police Reform act 2002, the Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2012 and the Independent Police Complaints Commission Statutory Guidance.

 

She appears to replicate the decision and reasoning of Mr. Steve  (x) of the Police standard, in her decision to disapply my complaint.

 

She acts as if, she was unaware of the true nature of my complaint, in regards to fraud in the civil court.

 

Comments:  My complaint to the IOPC fell into the category of a chain of events, of wrong doing by the Metropolitan Police.

 

From the point of, illegally placing my image on the Met Police Most wanted Poster, in 2013

 

Continued, when I made a complaint to the then (IPCC) Independent Police Complaint Commission.

 

Further continued, when I started the court proceedings and throughout the court proceedings, upon till, the interim Hearing on the 9th January 2017.

 

Evidence supplied to the Police Standard and the IOPC, in the process of the complaint and the Appeal. Which they wilfully and/or otherwise turned a blinded eye to.

 

  1. The false CRIS crime report
  2. The fake CCTV footage
  3. The false witness statement of Helen Mackay of Tiffany & Co.
  4. The voice mail left by Detective Sergeant Brandon Gibbs. fabrication evidence
  5. The bad manipulated images of 113699.
  6. The two different Met Police most wanted poster, one recreated and one original.
  7. Snap shots of the fake CCTV footage
  8. The falsified viido 3 job sheet of  PC Humphrey
  9. The false entry of PC whyte, on the false CRIS crime report, referring to 19 Teeside Road, in Walthamstow London, which does not exist.

 

 

Conclusion Police Standard:

 

Mr Steve (x) of the Police Standard, wilfully and/or otherwise, disregarded the present complaint and inappropriately misapply, the disapplication rule, in regards to (Regulation 5, (2), section (a) of the Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulation 2012.) “More than 12 months have elapsed between the incident, or the latest incident, giving rise to the complaint and the making of the complaint.”

 

End analysis: Together, the IOPC and MPS showed total disregard, toward the complainant and the Police Complaint Procedures. It appears that, people like me, will not be treated fairly and/or equally, no matter what the law Say’s.

 

Final Words:

 

It appears that, the IOPC and MPS, has an unwritten rule, that people like me, must turn to the courts, in order to obtain the benefits of what is written in Law.

 

What surprise me, are the blatant disregard and the apparent racism, toward people like me, within the system.

 

If it where not for the Internet, my story would be hidden, if there were no court proceedings, I would have, no evidence of wrongdoing.

 

I can only imagine, what travesty of injustice went on in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s, in regards to people like me.

 

We are in the 21st Century and change must happen. What is written in law, we as people, regardless of colour or creed, must receive the benefits of these laws, without fear of injustice, being dispensed upon us, by the establishment

 

 

 

 

 

.